Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7833187›Full record

ArticleBritish heart journal1994

Trends in the age and sex of patients undergoing coronary revascularisation in the United Kingdom 1987-93.

N Black, S Langham, M Petticrew

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British heart journal, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effective management of stable angina.Quality in health care : QHC · 1998
    Pooled it
  2. Ageism between Medical and Preliminary Medical Persons in Korea.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ageism in cardiology.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Review
  7. Direct costs of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients aged 65 years or more and those under age 65.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 1999
    Article
  8. Does GP fundholding affect the use of tertiary services in the UK?Journal of epidemiology and community health · 1997
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardiological services for the elderly.Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N BlackDepartment of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
S Langham
M Petticrew
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe how coronary revascularisation rates in the United Kingdom (in the public and private sectors) vary by age and sex; how these relations have changed between 1987 and 1993; whether significant differences exist between geographical areas, public and private sectors, and hospitals; and to make comparisons with trends in North America. DESIGNS: Secondary analysis of data on the age, sex, procedure, NHS/private, and health district of residence of patients.

settingResident population of South East Thames, East Anglian, and North Western health regions and Greater Glasgow, Lanarkshire, and Ayr/Arran health boards (11.6 million; 20% United Kingdom population). PATIENTS: All 19,665 residents who underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary angioplasty without any concomitant procedure during 1987-8, 1989-90, 1991-2 and 1992-3 in either NHS or independent hospitals. MAIN MEASURES: Population based rates of revascularisation by age, sex, area of residence, and NHS/private treatment. Secular trends in the age (mean, standard deviation, range), and sex ratio (male to female) of patients.

resultsRevascularisation rates in men were about four times higher than in women (1992-3: 1340 v 362/10(6) aged 25 years or more). The highest rates were in those aged 55-64 years (for men) and 55-64 and 65-74 years (for women). In 1992-3 the mean age of female patients was three years older than that for men (61.2 v 58.3) and that for coronary artery grafting was over two years older than for angioplasty (59.4 v 56.9). Between 1987-8 and 1992-3 the male to female ratio decreased (4.2:1 to 3.55:1) and the mean age of patients increased steadily by about six months each year. Intervention rates for the older groups increased faster than those for the younger, particularly in high rate regions. The age and sex mix of patients varied between regions and districts/boards. The mean age of patients varied by nine years and the sex ratio varied twofold between NHS hospitals. The male to female ratio was higher in private than NHS patients (1992-3: 5.5:1 v 3.6:1), suggesting greater access to care for men than women in the private sector. The trends observed in the United Kingdom are similar to those that have occurred in North America, with the exception of a decrease in the male to female ratio, which has not previously been reported.

conclusionThe increase in the revascularisation rate has been accompanied by an increasing proportion of women and older people. The extent of these changes varies between geographical areas. The change in the sex ratio has occurred despite an increasing contribution by the private sector, to which women have less access than men.

Indexed as

Age DistributionPatient SelectionSex RatioAdultAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCanadaCoronary Artery BypassFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationPrivate SectorState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID7833187
PMCPMC1025539
OpenAlexW2070248800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.