Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7831626›Full record

Trial reportThorax1994

Influence of treatment on peak expiratory flow and its relation to airway hyperresponsiveness and symptoms. The Dutch CNSLD Study Group.

H A Kerstjens, P L Brand, P M de Jong, G H Koëter, D S Postma

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Inhaled corticosteroids for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  6. Anticholinergic agents for chronic asthma in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  7. Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 1999
    Guideline
  8. Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Systems Biology and Clinical Practice in Respiratory Medicine. The Twain Shall Meet.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Endpoints in respiratory diseases.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H A KerstjensDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Groningen.
P L Brand
P M de Jong
G H Koëter
D S Postma
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite effective treatments, the morbidity and mortality of obstructive airways disease (asthma and COPD) remains high. Home monitoring of peak expiratory flow (PEF) is increasingly being advocated as an aid to better management of obstructive airways disease. The few available studies describing effects of treatment on the level and variation of PEF have involved relatively small numbers of subjects and did not use control groups.

methodsPatients aged 18-60 years were selected with PC20 < or = 8 mg/ml and FEV1 < 95% confidence interval of predicted normal. They were randomised to receive, in addition to a beta 2 agonist, either an inhaled corticosteroid (BA+CS), an anticholinergic (BA+AC), or a placebo (BA+PL). One hundred and forty one of these subjects with moderately severe obstructive airways disease completed seven periods of two weeks of morning and afternoon PEF measurements at home during 18 months of blind follow up.

resultsImprovements in PEF occurred within the first three months of treatment with BA+CS and was subsequently maintained: the mean (SE) increase in morning PEF was 51 (8) l/min in the BA+CS group compared with no change in the other two groups. Similarly, afternoon PEF increased by 22 (7) l/min. Diurnal variation in PEF (amplitude %mean) decreased from 18.0% to 10.2% in the first three months of treatment with BA+CS. Within-subject relations between changes in diurnal variation in PEF and changes in PC20 were found to be predominantly negative (median rho-0.40) but with a large scatter. Relations between diurnal variation in PEF and changes in symptom scores, FEV1, and bronchodilator response were even weaker.

conclusionsIn patients with moderately severe obstructive airways disease, PEF rates and variation are greatly improved by inhaled corticosteroids. Since the relation of diurnal PEF variation with PC20, symptoms, FEV1, and bronchodilator response were all weak, these markers of disease severity may all provide different information on the actual disease state. PEF measurements should be used in addition to the other markers but not instead of them.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsthmaBeclomethasoneCircadian RhythmDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesForced Expiratory VolumeHumansIpratropiumLung Diseases, ObstructiveMaleMiddle AgedPeak Expiratory Flow RateBeclomethasoneIpratropiumTerbutaline

Identifiers

PMID7831626
PMCPMC475271
OpenAlexW1988509624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.