Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7828826›Full record

ArticleGenetics1994

Distribution of exchanges upon homologous recombination of exogenous DNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

D Carroll, C W Lehman, S Jeong-Yu, P Dohrmann, R J Dawson, J K Trautman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D CarrollDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132.
C W Lehman
S Jeong-Yu
P Dohrmann
R J Dawson
J K Trautman
University of Utah · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007464 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRUNWALD, DAVID J., STANFIELD, GILLIAN · 1985 to 2020
$6.1M
MULTIDISCPLINARY BASIC CANCER RESEARCH TRAININGT32CA009602 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI LEMONS, RICHARD S · 1988 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS 5T32 CA09602NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32 GM07464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination between DNA molecules injected into Xenopus oocyte nuclei was investigated by examining the recovery of information from differentially marked parental sequences. The injected recombination substrate was a linear DNA with terminal direct repeats of 1246 bp; one repeat differed from the other by eight single base-pair substitutions, distributed throughout the region of homology, each of which created or destroyed a restriction enzyme site. Recombination products were recovered and analyzed for their content of the diagnostic sites, either directly by Southern blot-hybridization or after cloning in bacteria. The majority (76%) of the cloned products appeared to be the result of simple exchanges-i.e., there was one sharp transition from sequences derived from one parent to sequences derived from the other. These simple exchanges were concentrated near the ends of the homologous interval and, thus, near the sites of the original molecular ends. Placing marked sites on only one side of the homologous overlap showed that marker recovery was governed largely by the positions of the molecular ends and not by the markers themselves. When a terminal nonhomology was present at one end of the substrate, the yield of recombinants was sharply decreased, but the pattern of exchanges was not affected, suggesting that products from end-blocked substrates arise by the same recombination pathway. Because of considerable evidence supporting a nonconservative, resection-annealing mechanism for recombination in oocytes, we interpret the distribution of exchanges as resulting from long-patch repair of extensive heteroduplex intermediates.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBlotting, SouthernCell NucleusDNA, BacterialFemaleGenes, BacterialMutagenesisOocytesPlasmidsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRepressor ProteinsRestriction MappingXenopus laevisBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialRepressor Proteinstetracycline resistance-encoding transposon repressor protein

Identifiers

PMID7828826
PMCPMC1206161
OpenAlexW1753411912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.