Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7822013›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity1995

Pathogenicity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in complement factor five-deficient mice.

J K Byron, K V Clemons, J H McCusker, R W Davis, D A Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  4. Fungal-Bacterial Interactions in Health and Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  5. Medical mycology case reports · 2019
    Article
  6. F1000Research · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Determination of MICING: a new assay for assessing minimal inhibitory concentration for invasive growth.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with increased virulence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J K ByronDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, California.
K V Clemons
J H McCusker
R W Davis
D A Stevens

Funding

REGULATORY SITES AND FACTORS FOR THE AIDS VIRUS HIV1R01AI027076 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, RONALD WAYNE · 1988 to 1992
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI 27076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously determined the relative virulence of isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the basis of differences in proliferation and resistance to clearance in CD-1 mice. These infections were not fatal. To further characterize S. cerevisiae pathogenesis, we studied a virulent clinical isolate, YJM128, and an avirulent nonclinical isolate, Y55, in C5-deficient mice. DBA/2N mice were infected intravenously with YJM128 or Y55, and temporal burdens of yeast cells in various organs were determined. After infection with 10(7) CFU, Y55 increased by 13-fold and YJM128 increased by 20-fold in the brain from day 0 to 3. In addition, YJM128 increased by 4-fold in the kidneys, whereas Y55 decreased by 16-fold. Both isolates declined in number in other organs. In all studies, 90% of mice infected with 10(7) CFU of YJM128 died between days 2 and 7, whereas no mice infected with equivalent numbers of Y55 died. No mice died after infection with 10(6) CFU of Y55 or YJM128. The importance of C5 was confirmed by studies using B10.D2/oSnJ (C5-) mice and their congenic C5+ counterparts. Again, the C5- mice were most susceptible to infection with S. cerevisiae, with 63% infected with YJM128 dying by day 7; no C5+ mice died. No Y55-infected mice died, and mean burdens in the brain at day 14 were sevenfold lower in C5+ mice than in C5- mice. Seven of 10 other S. cerevisiae isolates were also more virulent in DBA/2N than CD-1 mice, causing > or = 40% mortality. These data indicate that C5 is a critical factor in host resistance against S. cerevisiae infections and further confirm the pathogenic potential of some isolates of S. cerevisiae.

Indexed as

AnimalsComplement C5MaleMiceMice, Inbred DBAMice, Mutant StrainsMycosesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeComplement C5

Identifiers

PMID7822013
PMCPMC173020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.