ReviewChromosoma1994
Stably DNA-bound chromosomal proteins.
Review in Chromosoma, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development-dependent changes in the tight DNA-protein complexes of barley on chromosome and gene level.BMC plant biology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA accomplishes its biological function in a complex with nuclear proteins. A minor protein fraction has been found in chromatin which could not be dissociated from DNA by reagents abolishing non-covalent type of interactions. The controversy surrounding the nature of the protein moiety and the nature of the bond linking the two components on the one hand, and the fact pointing to its evolutionary conservatism and metabolic stability on the other, make it necessary to critically evaluate the data in view of the possible biological function for such proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7821084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.