ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis1995
Expression of MHC class I and class II antigens in primary breast carcinomas and synchronous nodal metastases.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer Immune Evasion Through Loss of MHC Class I Antigen Presentation.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Article
- Microarray analysis reveals potential mechanisms of BRMS1-mediated metastasis suppression.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2007Article
- Escape from immunotherapy: possible mechanisms that influence tumor regression/progression.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2004Review
- Immunocytochemical demonstration of down regulation of HLA class-I molecule expression in human metastatic breast carcinoma.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2004Article
- Breast cancer and the immune system: opportunities and pitfalls.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2001Review
- Role of intermediate filaments in migration, invasion and metastasis.Cancer metastasis reviews · 1996Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expression of the major histocompatibility (MHC) class I and class II antigens was studied by immunohistochemistry in a series of 70 primary breast carcinomas and in nodal metastases. In particular, the expression of class I (HLA A-B-C) and class II (DP, DQ and DR) molecules was compared in: a) primary breast cancers devoid of nodal metastases (n = 36) and tumors exhibiting metastatic deposits (n = 34) at the time of surgery, and b) primary breast carcinomas and their corresponding synchronous axillary nodal metastases. Reduced or absent HLA A-B-C antigen expression was seen in approximately 54.3% of primary breast carcinomas, whereas a partial or complete induction of class II products was observed in 18.5% (DQ), 30% (DP) or 48.5% (DR) of the same cases. An almost complete overlap of antigen expression was observed in breast tumors in which no metastases were found by histological examination of axillary nodes and in neoplasms showing histologically-diagnosed synchronous metastases. The reactivity for class I and class II antigens in nodal metastases roughly paralleled that exhibited by corresponding primary tumors. A discordant expression was seen in 11 cases (32%) stained for HLA A-B-C and in 8 (24%), 7 (21%) and 6 (18%) cases assayed for DP, DQ and DR products, respectively. When a discordant expression was detected, either decreased or increased staining patterns were observed in metastases. The finding of overlapping MHC antigenic profiles in the majority of primary breast tumors and nodal metastases casts doubts on the hypothesis that loss of MHC antigens can play an important role in the seeding and growth of metastatic breast carcinoma cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.