Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7819856›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1994

WHO in crisis.

F Godlee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Global Role of the World Health Organization.Global health governance : the scholarly journal for the new health security paradigm · 2009
    Article
  8. Article
  9. New leader, new hope for WHO.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
    Article
  10. Review
  11. WHO faces up to its tobacco links.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
    Article
  12. The World Bank and world health: changing sides.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Global health challenges: priorities for the 21st century.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 1997
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The WHO. A new strategy is needed.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1995
    Article
  17. The WHO. Nursing is underrepresented.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1995
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

F Godlee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Media attention has been focused on the leadership of the World Health Organisation, rather than on the real factors that limit WHO's effectiveness. These factors relate to the organisation's structure and also to its current priorities, methods, and management. This article examines the objectives and strategy of WHO in view of financial constraints and donor countries' demands; WHO's stated goal of integrated primary health care; staff morale; and the growing dislocation between the regions and headquarters.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelFinancial ManagementGlobal HealthHumansOrganizational ObjectivesTerminology as TopicWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID7819856
PMCPMC2541365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.