Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7818648›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1994

Effects of low dose versus conventional dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in essential hypertension.

R Harper, C N Ennis, B Sheridan, A B Atkinson, G D Johnston, P M Bell

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Diuretics in patients with chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Lipid effects of antihypertensive medications.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2012
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2002
    Article
  18. Diuretics in the therapy of hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2002
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Insulin resistance.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R HarperSir George E Clark Metabolic Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast.
C N Ennis
B Sheridan
A B Atkinson
G D Johnston
P M Bell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo see whether low dose thiazide diuretics given to patients with essential hypertension might avoid the adverse metabolic consequences seen with conventional doses.

designDouble blind randomised crossover study of two 12 week treatment periods with either low dose (1.25 mg) or conventional dose (5.0 mg) bendrofluazide given after a six week placebo run in period.

settingOutpatient clinics serving the greater Belfast area. SUBJECTS: 16 white non-diabetic patients (9 male) under 65 with essential hypertension recruited from general practices within the greater Belfast area.

main outcome measuresSystolic and diastolic blood pressure and peripheral and hepatic insulin action.

resultsOne man failed to complete the study. There were no differences between doses in their effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Bendrofluazide 1.25 mg had substantially less effect on serum potassium concentration than the 5.0 mg dose. There were no intertreatment differences in fasting glucose, insulin, cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations. Bendrofluazide 5.0 mg significantly increased postabsorptive endogenous glucose production compared with baseline (mean 10.9 (SD 1.2) v 10.0 (0.8) mumol/kg/min), whereas bendrofluazide 1.25 mg did not. Postabsorptive endogenous glucose production was significantly higher with bendrofluazide 5.0 mg compared with 1.25 mg (10.9 (1.2) v 9.9 (0.8) mumol/kg/min) but was suppressed to a similar extent after insulin (bendrofluazide 5.0 mg 2.8 (1.5) mumol/kg/min v bendrofluazide 1.25 mg 2.2 (1.5) mumol/kg/min). Exogenous glucose infusion rates required to maintain euglycaemia were not significantly different between doses and were similar to baseline.

conclusionsBendrofluazide 1.25 mg is as effective as conventional doses but has less adverse metabolic effect. In contrast with conventional doses, low dose bendrofluazide has no effect on hepatic insulin action. There is no difference between low and conventional doses of bendrofluazide in their effect on peripheral insulin sensitivity.

Indexed as

BendroflumethiazideBlood PressureDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHypertensionInsulinLiverMaleMiddle AgedPotassiumBendroflumethiazideInsulinPotassium

Identifiers

PMID7818648
PMCPMC2540765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.