ReviewLung1994
Cellular and immunological markers of allergic and intrinsic bronchial asthma.
Review in Lung, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adult-Onset Compared to Childhood-Onset Asthma: Multifaceted Symptoms, Comorbidity, and Healthcare Burden.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
- The Mediating Effect of Cytokines on the Association between Fungal Sensitization and Poor Clinical Outcome in Asthma.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- The Role of Atopy in COPD and Asthma.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- In patients with severe asthma with eosinophilia in reslizumab clinical trials, high peripheral blood eosinophil levels are associated with low FEVAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020Article
- Effects of Diatomaceous Earth on House Dust Mite Sensitization in BALB/c Mice.Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2019Article
- Personalised medicine in asthma: from curative to preventive medicine.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2017Review
- Chemokines: structure, receptors and functions. A new target for inflammation and asthma therapy?Mediators of inflammation · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on a growing body of evidence, allergic as well as intrinsic bronchial asthma have recently been defined as chronic persistent inflammatory disorders. Agreement has been reached that asthma can no longer be equated with bronchospasm only, and that the absence of reversibility of airflow obstruction does not exclude bronchial asthma. Bronchial hyperreactivity, on the other hand, although common to the vast majority of asthmatics, is not specific for bronchial asthma and provocation tests to measure bronchial hyperreactivity are not suited for routine monitoring of bronchial asthma. The clinical features of asthma are related to cellular as well as to soluble parameters of bronchial inflammation. Therefore, means of assessing and monitoring asthmatic inflammation have been investigated. Since eosinophils, T lymphocytes, mast cells, macrophages, neutrophils, epithelial cells, and structural cells, as well as various proinflammatory mediators and proteins, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma, it has been anticipated that several of these cells or mediators might be either diagnostic of bronchial asthma or could serve as markers to monitor the underlying bronchial inflammation. Currently there is no diagnostic marker of bronchial asthma, which, on its own, either confirms or excludes bronchial asthma with appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Clinically the most reliable feature of bronchial asthma that seems to be related closely to the symptomatology still is the presence of eosinophils in peripheral blood, and especially in sputum. Eosinophil-derived products, particularly eosinophil granule proteins, have been investigated as markers of eosinophil participation in the pathogenesis of asthma and, comparable to eosinophil numbers themselves, are possible predictors of impending exacerbations of allergic, as well as intrinsic bronchial asthma. However, clinically their precise value in diagnosing and monitoring of bronchial asthma has not been documented convincingly and requires further investigation. Increasing data suggest that the regulation of eosinophilia is largely conveyed by interleukin-5 (IL-5) released from activated T-helper lymphocytes and possibly other cells. Therefore, T-lymphocyte activation, and especially assessment of systemic and local IL-5 levels, might be of diagnostic value and possibly useful in monitoring of inflammation in bronchial asthma in the future. A possible role and future applications for other markers of inflammation not related to eosinophils in monitoring or diagnosing bronchial asthma need to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.