Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7811003›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1994

In vivo efficacy of a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in a mouse pneumonia model.

P Moine, E Vallée, E Azoulay-Dupuis, P Bourget, J P Bédos, J Bauchet, J J Pocidalo

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Index Linked toAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  5. Persistent Borrelia burgdorferiClinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  6. Tissue compartmentalization enablesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Clinically relevant model of pneumococcal pneumonia, ARDS, and nonpulmonary organ dysfunction in mice.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Animal Models ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Animal models of Streptococcus pneumoniae disease.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2008
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P MoineInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 13, Paris, France.
E Vallée
E Azoulay-Dupuis
P Bourget
J P Bédos
J Bauchet
J J Pocidalo
Institut National de Santé Publique · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing emergence of penicillin-resistant (Pr) strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae could pose a therapeutic problem in the next few years. Ceftriaxone (CRO), a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, exhibits a smaller increase in MICs against Pr S. pneumoniae strains than amoxicillin (AMO) (usually referred as to the "gold standard" therapy for pneumococcal infections). Therefore, we compared their respective efficacies in a leukopenic Swiss mouse model of pneumococcal pneumonia. Infection was induced with two serotype 19 strains: a penicillin-susceptible (Ps) strain (MICs of < 0.01 for penicillin, 0.03 for AMO, and 0.03 for CRO) and a Pr strain (MICs of 4 for penicillin, 2 for AMO, and 0.5 for CRO). Untreated mice died within 2 or 3 days. Against the Ps strain, the minimal protective dose (two subcutaneous injections at 12-h intervals for 3 days) for both CRO and AMO was 5 mg/kg of body weight (87% survivors). Ten-fold-increased doses of CRO (50 mg/kg) gave similar protection (75% survivors) against the Pr strain, whereas 20- and 40-fold-increased doses of AMO protected 0 and 34% of the animals, respectively, against the Ps strain. CRO had a marked and prolonged antibacterial effect in the lungs (2.7-log-unit reduction of CFU in 24 h after a single 50-mg/kg injection) against the Pr strain in comparison with AMO. A standard dosage of 50 mg of CRO per kg in mice resulted in peak levels in serum and protein binding comparable to those observed with 1 g given intravenously in humans. This dosage remained effective against a highly Pr S. pneumoniae strain in this model. The microbiological activity and pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of CRO (time during which concentrations exceed the MIC for the test pathogen [delta t MIC], > or less than 8 h; and peak/MIC ratio, >90 for free active drug) accounted for its efficacy relative to AMO (50 mg/kg: delta t MIC, <2; peak/MIC ratio, <25) against the highly Pr S. pneumoniae strain used in this study.

Indexed as

Penicillin ResistanceAmoxicillinAnimalsCeftriaxoneDisease Models, AnimalFemaleInjections, SubcutaneousLungMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPneumococcal InfectionsPneumonia, PneumococcalStreptococcus pneumoniaeAmoxicillinCeftriaxone

Identifiers

PMID7811003
PMCPMC284667
OpenAlexW2118307170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.