Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7809088›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994

Synergistic binding of the Vibrio fischeri LuxR transcriptional activator domain and RNA polymerase to the lux promoter region.

A M Stevens, K M Dolan, E P Greenberg

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 239 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RepurposingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Computational and Biological Evaluation ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Screening of Bacterial Quorum Sensing Inhibitors in aPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A M StevensDepartment of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
K M Dolan
E P Greenberg
University of Iowa · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007343 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI STAPLETON, JACK T. · 1988 to 2024
$5.0M
NIAID NIH HHS T32-AI07343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LuxR, the Vibrio fischeri luminescence gene (lux) activator, is the best-studied member of a family of bacterial transcription factors required for cell density-dependent expression of specific genes involved in associations with eukaryotic hosts. Neither LuxR nor any other LuxR homolog has been shown to bind DNA directly. We have purified the LuxR C-terminal transcriptional activator domain from extracts of recombinant Escherichia coli in which this polypeptide was expressed. The purified polypeptide by itself binds to lux regulatory DNA upstream of the lux box, a 20-bp palindrome that is required for LuxR activity in vivo, but it does not bind to the lux box. However, the LuxR C-terminal domain together with RNA polymerase protects a region including the lux box and the lux operon promoter from DNase I cleavage. There is very little protection of the lux operon promoter region from DNase I digestion in the presence of RNA polymerase alone. Apparently, there is a synergistic binding of the LuxR C-terminal domain and RNA polymerase to the promoter region. The upstream binding region for the purified polypeptide encompasses a binding site for cAMP receptor protein (CRP). Under some conditions, CRP binding can block the binding of the LuxR C-terminal domain to the upstream binding region, and it can also block the synergistic binding of the LuxR C-terminal domain and RNA polymerase to the lux box and luminescence gene promoter region. This description of DNA binding by the LuxR C-terminal domain should lead to an understanding of the molecular interactions of the LuxR family of transcriptional activators with regulatory DNA.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialPromoter Regions, GeneticRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesIn Vitro TechniquesLuminescent ProteinsOperonReceptors, Cyclic AMPRecombinant ProteinsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA, MessengerVibrioBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesLuminescent ProteinsLuxR autoinducer binding proteinsReceptors, Cyclic AMPRecombinant ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID7809088
PMCPMC45490
OpenAlexW1969638357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.