ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1994
Comparison of the foetal development of fibre types in four bovine muscles.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin A regulates intramuscular adipose tissue and muscle development: promoting high-quality beef production.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Article
- Maternal and paternal genomes differentially affect myofibre characteristics and muscle weights of bovine fetuses at midgestation.PloS one · 2013Article
- Myosin heavy chain isoform transitions in canine skeletal muscles during postnatal growth.Journal of anatomy · 2006Article
- Genetic variability of foetal bovine myoblasts in primary culture.The Histochemical journal · 1999Article
- Age-related changes and location of type I, III and IV collagens during skeletal muscle development of double-muscled and normal bovine foetuses.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 1998Article
- Myosin isoform transitions in four rabbit muscles during postnatal growth.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 1996Article
- Comparison of the foetal development of muscle in normal and double-muscled cattle.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pattern of expression of different types of myosin heavy chains and the development of different generations of muscle cells during foetal life were studied in four bovine muscles with widely varying characteristics, the Masseter, Longissimus thoracis, Cutaneus trunci and Diaphragma. Different complementary techniques were performed: immunocytochemistry, electrophoresis, immunoblotting and ELISA. Monoclonal antibodies against different myosin heavy chain isoforms were used. The results confirmed the existence of at least two generations of cells during foetal development in cattle. A first generation, which appeared at a very early stage, gave rise to adult type I fibres. A second generation, made up of different cell populations, gave rise to adult fast type IIA and IIB fibres, and to type IIC. In the slow muscles, it also seemed to give rise to type I fibres. The beginning of myogenesis was characterized in the different cell generations by the expression of transitory myosin forms that are not found in the adult. Type 1 myosin heavy chain was observed from 90 days whereas the fast types, 2a and 2b, were present from 210 to 230 days, at which stage the foetal form disappeared. Muscles that have greatly different contractile characteristics in the adult exhibit also different profiles of differentiation: the Diaphragma was the first to develop, followed by Cutaneus trunci, Longissimus thoracis and Masseter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.