Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7806022›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia1994

Value of antibodies to GAD65 combined with islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies for predicting IDDM in a childhood population.

H J Aanstoot, E Sigurdsson, M Jaffe, Y Shi, S Christgau, D Grobbee, G J Bruining, J L Molenaar, A Hofman, S Baekkeskov

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multiplicity of the antibody response to GAD65 in Type I diabetes.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2004
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic analysis of type 1 diabetes using whole genome approaches.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1995
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H J AanstootDepartment of Microbiology/Immunology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0534.
E Sigurdsson
M Jaffe
Y Shi
S Christgau
D Grobbee
G J Bruining
J L Molenaar
A Hofman
S Baekkeskov
University of California, San Francisco · USErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of a test for islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies together with a test for GAD65 antibodies to predict the subsequent development of diabetes over a period of 11.5 years was assessed in an open childhood population comprising 2,805 individuals. A single serum sample was obtained from each individual between 1975 and 1977 and screened for islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies for which eight individuals were positive (0.29%). During the average follow-up period of 11.5 years, four of eight islet cell antibody positive and three islet cell antibody negative individuals developed clinical diabetes. Sera from all individuals, who were islet cell antibody positive and/or developed diabetes (total of 11) and from 100 randomly selected control subjects were analysed for GAD65 antibodies. Six of eight islet cell antibody positive individuals were GAD65 antibody positive including all four who subsequently developed IDDM. Furthermore, one of the three islet cell antibody negative individuals who developed IDDM was GAD65 antibody positive both in 1976 and in 1989. Thus, a positive test for GAD65 antibodies alone correctly predicted diabetes in five of seven children, who developed the disease. Only one of the children, who developed diabetes was positive for insulin autoantibodies and this individual was also positive for islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies and GAD65 antibodies. One of the 100 control subjects was positive for GAD65 antibodies (1%). The results suggest that a single GAD65 antibody test may have a higher sensitivity for predicting IDDM than a test for islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies, but that a combined positive test for both antibodies increases the specificity for predicting IDDM over a period of 11.5 years.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAutoantibodiesCell LineChildChild, PreschoolChlorocebus aethiopsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Glutamate DecarboxylaseHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansIslets of LangerhansLongitudinal StudiesPredictive Value of TestsAutoantibodiesGlutamate DecarboxylaseHLA Antigensislet cell antibodyRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID7806022
OpenAlexW1983815576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.