ArticleDiabetologia1994
The role of islet secretory function in the development of diabetes in the GK Wistar rat.
Article in Diabetologia, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical study of diabetic foot ulcers: From pathogenesis to vivo/vitro models and clinical therapeutic transformation.International wound journal · 2023Review
- Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Glucose Metabolism Disorder in Diabetic Pancreatic β-Cells.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Calcium Signaling in the Ventricular Myocardium of the Goto-Kakizaki Type 2 Diabetic Rat.Journal of diabetes research · 2018Review
- Article
- Immunohistochemical and electron-microscopic observation of beta-cells in pancreatic islets of spontaneously diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats.Medical molecular morphology · 2006Article
- Characterization of the action of S 21403 (mitiglinide) on insulin secretion and biosynthesis in normal and diabetic beta-cells.British journal of pharmacology · 2005Article
- Impaired glucose tolerance and mild hyperglycemia in sucrose-fed rats does not impair insulin secretion.Acta diabetologica · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insulin secretion and glucose metabolism were compared in islets isolated from GK Wistar rats (a non-obese, spontaneous model of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) and control Wistars aged 8 and 14 weeks. By 8 weeks of age, GK Wistar rats were clearly diabetic as indicated by non-fasting plasma glucose concentrations and impaired glucose tolerance. Islet insulin content was not significantly different to controls at either age. In islets from 14-week-old GK Wistar rats glucose-stimulated insulin release (6-16 mmol/l glucose) was significantly reduced to 25-50% of controls in static incubations (p < 0.001). In perifusion, glucose-stimulated insulin release was reduced by 90% for first phase (p < 0.01) and by 75% for second phase (p < 0.05). The responses to arginine and 2 alpha Ketoisocaproate in islets were similar to those in controls. In contrast, islets isolated from 8-week-old GK Wistar rats exhibited no significant reduction in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in static incubations. In perifusion, although both first and second phases of glucose-stimulated insulin release were slightly reduced, these were not significantly different to controls. Islets from 8-week-old GK Wistar rats failed however to respond to stimulation by glyceraldehyde. Raising the medium glucose concentration to 16 mmol/l significantly increased rates of glucose utilisation ([3H] H2O production from 5-[3H] glucose) and oxidation ([14C] CO2 production from U-[14C] glucose) in islets isolated from 8-week-old control and GK Wistar rats, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
7806015What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.