ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology1995
In vivo screening models of cisplatin-resistant human lung cancer cell lines using SCID mice.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nedaplatin concurrent with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Trial
- In vitro and in vivo modulation by rhizoxin of non-P-glycoprotein-mediated vindesine resistance.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vivo screening models of a cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant human small-cell lung cancer cell (SCLC) line, H69/CDDP, and a non-small-cell lung cancer cell (NSCLC) line, PC-14/CDDP, were evaluated. The transplantability of the tumor xenografts to SCID mice was more than 90%. Tumor xenografts of H69/CDDP and PC-14/CDDP showed CDDP resistance during in vivo treatment. The novel anticancer agent 254-S showed only a partial effect on the growth of H69/CDDP and PC-14/CDDP while ormaplatin showed no cross resistance to CDDP. The in vivo results correlated well with the results of the in vitro MTT assay. In this in vivo sensitivity test, H69/CDDP and PC-14/CDDP were more sensitive to ormaplatin than its parental cell lines. In vivo sensitivity testing using SCID mice bearing transplanted CDDP-resistant tumors was shown to be useful for evaluating the effects of new anti-cancer drugs, especially those that might overcome CDDP resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7805177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.