ArticleArchives of virology1994
Effect of the selection pressure with anti-VP7 and anti-VP4 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies on reassortant formation between two human rotaviruses.
Article in Archives of virology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species-specific and interspecies relatedness of NSP1 sequences in human, porcine, bovine, feline, and equine rotavirus strains.Archives of virology · 1996Article
- G (VP7) serotype-dependent preferential VP7 gene selection detected in the genetic background of simian rotavirus SA11.Archives of virology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to study the effect of selection pressure of anti-VP4 and anti-VP7 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies(N-MAbs) on reassortant formation, 424 reassortant clones were produced from mixed cultures of human rotavirus strains Wa and HN126 and their genotypes were analysed. Reassortant selection was done with four types of N-MAb: anti-VP4 MAb to Wa and anti-VP7 MAb to HN126(selection A); anti-VP4 MAb to HN126 and anti-VP7 MAb to Wa(selection B); anti-VP7 MAb to Wa(selection C); and anti-VP4 MAb to Wa(selection D). In each selection experiment, more than 100 clones were isolated, and the parental origin of RNA segments was identified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. All clones isolated by selections A and B were found to be antigenic mosaic reassortants with the VP4 gene of HN126 and the VP7 gene of Wa and antigenic mosaic reassortants with the VP4 gene of Wa and the VP7 gene of HN126, respectively. Although in reassortants of both selections, RNA segments 2, 3, 5 and 6 were selected from strain Wa at considerably high rates, selection rates of RNA segments 1, 7, 8, and 11 were significantly different between selection A and B. In reassortants from selection C and D, selection rates of RNA segments 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 11 from Wa were significantly lower than those in selection A and B, whereas RNA segments 2 and 5 were almost exclusively selected from Wa as observed in selection A and B. These results indicated the presence of two types of nonrandom gene selection in reassortant formation, one strongly dependent on, and another irrespective of, the selection pressure with N-MAbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7802855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.