Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7796344›Full record

Trial reportCalcified tissue international1995

Prevention of bone loss in early nonsurgical and nonosteoporotic high turnover patients with salmon calcitonin: the role of biochemical bone markers in monitoring high turnover patients under calcitonin treatment.

G P Lyritis, B Magiasis, N Tsakalakos

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Calcified tissue international, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Ultrasound parameters in osteoporotic patients treated with salmon calcitonin: a longitudinal study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 1996
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G P LyritisLaboratory for the Research of Musculoskeletal System, Th. Garofalidis University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Kifissia, Greece.
B Magiasis
N Tsakalakos
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRGeneral Hospital of Attica · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annual bone loss rate was estimated in a group of randomly selected 150 nonsurgical and nonosteoporotic early postmenopausal women, 42-56 years, with the use of the mathematical equation proposed by Christiansen et al. (OSTEOTREND-R) [1]. Fifty-six women were characterized as high turnover patients (estimated annual bone loss more than 2.7%). These high turnover patients were included in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Patients were divided into two groups of 28 women each. The first group of patients received 100 IU of salmon calcitonin intranasally daily for 1 year and the second group intranasal spray of placebo daily. Blood and urine biochemical parameters as well as bone mineral content of the spine and proximal forearm were determined initially and at the end of 6 and 12 months. No other side effects were noted apart from discomfort of nasal mucosa in two patients (one in each group). The group of calcitonin-treated patients showed a dramatic decrease in bone loss rate as estimated with the use of biochemical bone markers at the end of 6 and 12 months (3.7% versus 0.8% and 0.0% at the end of 6 and 12 months, respectively, P < 0.001) whereas in the placebo group, bone loss rate remained unchanged (4.2% versus 4.1% and 4.3% at the end of 6 and 12 months, respectively). The calcitonin-treated patients showed a significant increase in bone mineral content of spine and proximal forearm (P < 0.001 at the end of 6 and 12 months, respectively). On the other hand, a significant decrease in all measurement sites appeared in the placebo group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBone DensityBone ResorptionCalcitoninDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMathematicsMiddle AgedBiomarkersCalcitoninsalmon calcitonin

Identifiers

PMID7796344
OpenAlexW2081883719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.