ArticleCalcified tissue international1995
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with vertebral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.
Article in Calcified tissue international, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determination of a standard site for the measurement of bone mineral density of the human calcaneus.Journal of anatomy · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of using bone mineral measurements of the calcaneus to evaluate osteoporosis. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus was compared with posteroanterior lumbar absorptiometry (DXA) and vertebral quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements in 171 white women (78 normal and 93 osteoporotic). DXA measurement of os calcis mineralization decreased significantly in osteoporosis, but to a lesser extent than in vertebral sites. In normal subjects, good correlations were observed between calcaneal and lumbar DXA (0.69) and QCT (0.56). In subjects with vertebral fractures, there was also good correlation between calcaneal DXA and QCT (0.59-0.69). This suggests that trabecular bone in calcaneus and vertebrae have related involution in cases of vertebral osteoporosis. However, the extent of bone loss is less marked in the calcaneus than in the vertebrae and is not sufficient to be accurately measured over time. We conclude, therefore, that although the global densitometric measurement at this site is not sufficiently sensitive for general use, it can be useful as a epidemiological research tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.