ArticleAnnals of surgery1995
Oncogene protein co-expression. Value of Ha-ras, c-myc, c-fos, and p53 as prognostic discriminants for breast carcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgery, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis: coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53.Annals of surgery · 2001Trial
- Exploring CISD1 as a multifaceted biomarker in cancer: Implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapeutic response.Genes & diseases · 2025Article
- Advances in the relationship between AP-1 and tumorigenesis, development and therapy resistance.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Suppression of the malignancy of mammary tumor in mice model by inactivated preparation ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2022Article
- Revealing nuclear receptor hub modules from Basal-like breast cancer expression networks.PloS one · 2021Article
- The Antisense long noncoding RNA AGAP2-AS1 regulates cell proliferation and metastasis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Dihydrocapsaicin Inhibits Epithelial Cell Transformation through Targeting Amino Acid Signaling and c-Fos Expression.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Eugenol inhibits oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation via downregulation of c-Myc/PGC-1β/ERRα signaling pathway in MCF10A-ras cells.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- c-Fos over-expression promotes radioresistance and predicts poor prognosis in malignant glioma.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Tumour sampling method can significantly influence gene expression profiles derived from neoadjuvant window studies.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
- Expression of c-fos was associated with clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in pancreatic cancer.PloS one · 2015Article
- Impact of c-MYC protein expression on outcome of patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab NCCTG (alliance) N9831.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013Article
- Article
- MYC pathway activation in triple-negative breast cancer is synthetic lethal with CDK inhibition.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2012Article
- C-Fos expression is a molecular predictor of progression and survival in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2008Article
- The effects of timing of fine needle aspiration biopsies on gene expression profiles in breast cancers.BMC cancer · 2008Article
- Article
- PTEN down regulates AP-1 and targets c-fos in human glioma cells via PI3-kinase/Akt pathway.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2007Article
- Prognostic significance of loss of c-fos protein in gastric carcinoma.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA refinement of prognostic variables using traditional pathologic markers integrated with oncogene proteins, enzymes, and hormonal factors may enhance the ability to predict for recurrence or survival in patients with mammary carcinoma. Although various oncogenes and oncogene products have been identified in human breast carcinoma, their relationship to disease outcome remains controversial.
methodsUsing the monoclonal antibodies cS93.1, 9E1.0, F235-1.7.1, and PAb 1801 against each oncogene protein studied, the avidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase method provided immunohistochemical staining of bound oncogene protein for c-fos, c-myc, Ha-ras, and p53, respectively. Analyses were made on archival pathology tissues of 85 breast cancer patients (stages I, IIA, and IIB). Forty patients (47%) had recurrence of disease; 45 remained free of local-regional or distant disease at mean follow-up of 48 months (range 6-180 months). Molecular biological data were merged with clinicopathologic demographics 1) to determine the frequency of single or co-expression of oncogenes in this patient population; 2) to evaluate the value of these molecular protein markers to predict probability of recurrence; and 3) to determine worth of the studied oncogenes to correlate with traditional clinical pathologic parameters and overall survival.
resultsIn this study, oncogene expression had statistical correlation for recurrence with increasing co-expression: one oncogene 17.2%, two oncogenes 56.3%, three or four oncogenes, 100% (p = 0.001). Increasing oncogene or co-oncogene expression correlated with statistically significant reduction in disease-free and overall survival; with no expression of oncogenes, disease-free survival was 30 (SE +/- 5.7) months and overall survival was 56.4 (SE +/- 4.57) months. With expression of three oncogenes, disease-free survival was 12 (SE +/- 1.23) months (p = 0.0018) and overall survival was 23.4 (SE +/- 3.38) months (p = 0.0025). In univariate Wilcoxon analysis, oncogene expression was the most significant variable to determine survival (p = 0.035); in multivariate analysis, age and oncogene co-expression each emerged as the most significant variables for overall survival. For the proportional hazards regression model, oncogene co-expression was significant (p = 0.0104, risk-ratio 1.914) and correlated with age and tumor size as significant variables. Ha-ras and c-fos both emerged as important individual oncogene proteins to affect survival (p = 0.0925, risk-ratio 3.517 and p = 0.025, risk-ratio 4.214, respectively). The proto-oncogene c-myc and the antitumor suppressor gene p53 did not have significant effects as individual oncogenes to influence survival.
conclusionsApproximately one fifth of the breast cancer patients in this analysis (disease-free and recurrent) expressed only a single oncogene marker (c-fos, c-myc, Ha-ras, or p53); one quarter of patients with recurrent disease expressed only one oncogene protein. Single oncogene expression did not possess independent prognostic significance for prediction of recurrence. Further, p53 mutations did not function as independent correlates for prognosis. The co-expression of the studied proto-oncogenes (c-myc, Ha-ras) and the nuclear transcriptional protein (c-fos) functioned as a strong prognostic correlate for recurrence and survival; the effect of individual oncogenes to predict survival was greatest for Ha-ras and c-fos. Immediate or early co-expression of three oncogene proteins in neoplastic transformation endowed cells of invasive carcinoma with an aggressive phenotype. This aggressive phenotype was evident in a small percentage of the studied population (11%) and predicted adverse disease-free and overall survival. These findings suggest that oncogene co-expression possesses significant prognostic and potential therapeutic value; incorporation of this molecular technology into future prospective randomized trials is advisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.