Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7782218›Full record

ArticleHealth services research1995

Small area variations in health care delivery in Maryland.

A Gittelsohn, N R Powe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mental health service areas in Switzerland.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Do pediatric hospitalizations have a unique geography?BMC health services research · 2004
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Causes and costs of hospitalization of tuberculosis patients in the United States.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2000
    Article
  12. Sources of influence on medical practice.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2000
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multilevel factors associated with dentists' counseling of pregnant women about periodontal health.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A GittelsohnSchool of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
N R Powe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur purpose is a descriptive analysis of variations in hospital use among small areas of Maryland. DATA SOURCE: The data are Maryland patient discharge records from acute care hospitals for 1985-1987 and small area population estimates by age, gender, race, and income.

findingsThe common finding was excess geographic variability among Maryland's 115 areas. The hypothesis of uniform rates was rejected for most DRGs, including low-variation mastectomy and hernia repair. Clustering of high-use rates occurred in neighboring areas for orthopedic, vascular, and elective procedures. Admission rates for most nondiscretionary procedures and medical DRGs were reduced in affluent areas while discretionary surgery increased with income level. Elective procedures had extreme variation and were related to income. Coronary artery disease rates declined with income while coronary artery procedure rates increased, indicating that access and patient selection were factors in the use of coronary bypass and angioplasty.

conclusionsThe issue is not the ubiquitous variation among small areas but its extent and identification of geographic patterns. Hospital use is related to demography, morbidity, medical resources, access, selection for care, and physician practice patterns. Heterogeneity of these factors ensures that uniform delivery of health care rarely holds. There is little evidence that incidence of surgical disease is the main source of variation in use of discretionary surgery. Rather, variations reflect differing medical opinion on appropriate use. Without evaluation, excessive use cannot be distinguished from underservice. Morbidity explains the variability of nondiscretionary surgery and conditions related to lifestyle. Access plays an important role for discretionary surgery. Geographic analysis can identify variation and relate incidence to socioeconomic and specific local effects. Hospital data do not permit direct assessment of appropriate care. Understanding the reasons for variation requires information beyond incidence data. The challenge is to identify and explain small area variations or to fix them.

Indexed as

Utilization ReviewCatchment Area, HealthDiagnosis-Related GroupsDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleGeographyHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHospitalsHumansMaleMarylandPatient ReadmissionRacial GroupsSmall-Area AnalysisSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID7782218
PMCPMC1070065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.