ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine1995
Pressure on communication of results of clinical research: potential for improper practice. Proceedings of a meeting. London, October 13, 1993.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In earlier times, clinical researchers published the results of their studies as seemed most appropriate to them. In an increasingly computerized and communicative environment this is no longer satisfactory, since now there are a number of other groups whose interests need to be taken into account. These include patients, medical journals, the Stock Exchange, the media and the law. This supplement arises out of a meeting established to describe the methods used to communicate clinical research results, the timing and the needs of other groups in an attempt to improve understanding and to identify preferred practice. Avoidance by clinical investigators of conflict of interest and accusations of improper practice clearly merit discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7776318PMC1295037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.