ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Characterization of endothelin receptors in rat renal artery in vitro.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional characterization and expression of endothelin receptors in rat carotid artery: involvement of nitric oxide, a vasodilator prostanoid and the opening of K+ channels in ETB-induced relaxation.British journal of pharmacology · 2005Article
- Electrophysiological effects of endothelin-1 and their relationship to contraction in rat renal arterial smooth muscle.British journal of pharmacology · 2000Article
- Thapsigargin-induced endothelium-dependent triphasic regulation of vascular tone in the porcine renal artery.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
- Influence of endothelins and sarafotoxin 6c and L-NAME on renal vasoconstriction in the anaesthetized rat.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The aim of this study was to investigate the function and characteristics of endothelin receptors in rat main branch renal artery in vitro. 2. Endothelin(ET)-1 (mean EC50 = 9.8 nM) was approximately 12 fold more potent than ET-3 (mean EC50 = 120 nM) as a contractile agonist and produced a greater maximum response. In contrast, neither of the ETB receptor-selective agonists, alanine[1,3,11,15]ET-1 nor sarafotoxin S6c, (0.1 nM-1 microM), induced any contractile effect, or any relaxant effect in endothelium-intact preparations pre-contracted with the thromboxane A2 mimetic, U-46619. Sarafotoxin S6c (30 nM) also failed to induce any further contraction in tissues pre-contracted with an EC50 concentration of ET-1. 3. The ETA receptor-selective antagonist, BQ123, behaved as a weak and variable antagonist of the contractile effects of ET-1 (mean pA2 estimates in the range 5.8-6.3). In contrast, BQ123 antagonized ET-3 with a potency (mean pA2 = 7.6) consistent with its affinity for ETA receptors. Co-incubation of BQ123 (3 microM) with the putative ETB receptor-selective antagonist, IRL1038 (10 microM), produced no greater antagonism of ET-1 responses than was induced by BQ123 (3 microM) alone. 4. In conclusion, ETB receptors do not appear to be present in rat main branch renal artery. The contractile effects of ET-3 in this tissue seem to be mediated by ETA receptors. While ETA receptors partly mediate the contractile effects of ET-1, these data raise the possibility that a population of novel BQ123-insensitive endothelin receptors may also contribute to this response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.