ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995
How can health service users contribute to the NHS research and development programme?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- Self management, joint protection and exercises in hand osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial with cost effectiveness analyses.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2011Trial
- Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Involving Patient Partners in the KRESCENT Peer Review: Intent, Process, Challenges, and Opportunities.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- A protocol to evaluate the impact of embedding Public and Patient Involvement in a structured PhD program for stroke care.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- How is knowledge shared in Public involvement? A qualitative study of involvement in a health technology assessment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: reflections and experiences of the PPI contributors and researcher.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research.F1000Research · 2018Article
- Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patient registry.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018Article
- What women want from women's reproductive health research: a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK-based, small-scale service evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of patient partnership to improve access to primary care for the physical health of patients with severe mental illnesses: an interactive guide.International journal for equity in health · 2015Article
- Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).Health services insights · 2013Article
- A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice.Health research policy and systems · 2010Article
- Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009Article
- From inclusion to independence--training consumers to review research.Health research policy and systems · 2008Article
- Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Childbirth Trust, along with other groups of health service users, is working with health professionals and researchers in planning clinical trials, setting priorities for research, systematically reviewing research reports, and getting research findings into practice. User groups may bridge the gap between the public and researchers by explaining research issues to a wide audience, presenting the needs and views of health service users to the research community, and suggesting how members of the public may be approached for their views directly. Service users recognise their need for training and support, and they call for development and evaluation of this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.