ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995
The rights of patients in research.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Incorporating patients' perspectives into the initial stages of core outcome set development: a rapid review of qualitative studies of type 2 diabetes.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2019Pooled it
- Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014Pooled it
- Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey.Trials · 2010Trial
- Improving question formulation for use in evidence appraisal in a tertiary care setting: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN66375463].BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2001Trial
- Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1998Trial
- The CIRCULAR model: advancing public health through citizen science initiated clinical and mechanistic research in atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- "How would you handle this?" The impact of embedding early patient and public involvement in a biomechanical computational engineering doctoral research project.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE): how valuable and how hard? An evaluation of ALL_EARS@UoS PPIE group, 18 months on.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- The most important problems and needs of rasopathy patients with a noonan syndrome spectrum disorder.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Establishing the research agenda for oral healthcare using the Dialogue Model-patient involvement in a joint research agenda with practitioners.European journal of oral sciences · 2022Article
- Involving Patient Partners in the KRESCENT Peer Review: Intent, Process, Challenges, and Opportunities.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- Patient engagement in the design of clinical research in Noonan syndrome spectrum disorders: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- A research agenda on oral health care as a boundary object that unites the perspectives of patients and practitioners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- How is knowledge shared in Public involvement? A qualitative study of involvement in a health technology assessment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: Impact, resources and recommendations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Research in haematological cancers: What do patients in the Netherlands prioritise?European journal of cancer care · 2019Article
- Patient-initiated recruitment for clinical research: Evaluation of an outpatient letter research statement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- Parent, patient and clinician perceptions of outcomes during and following neonatal care: a systematic review of qualitative research.BMJ paediatrics open · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.