Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7768255›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology1995

Effect of probenecid on the formation and elimination kinetics of the sulphate and glucuronide conjugates of diflunisal.

J I Macdonald, S M Wallace, R J Herman, R K Verbeeck

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J I MacdonaldCatholic University of Louvain, School of Pharmacy, Brussels, Belgium.
S M Wallace
R J Herman
R K Verbeeck
University of Saskatchewan · CAUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of diflunisal and its glucuronide and sulphate conjugates was studied in 8 healthy volunteers. Diflunisal 250 mg b.d. was administered p.o. for 15 days and its steady state pharmacokinetics was evaluated on Day 16 after the last dose (control phase). Probenecid 500 mg b.d. was co-administered throughout the entire study period in the treatment phase of the study. The steady state plasma concentration of diflunisal was significantly higher during the probenecid treatment phase as compared to the control phase (104.0 vs. 63.1 micrograms.ml-1). This was the result of a significant decrease in the plasma clearance of diflunisal from 5.8 (control) to 3.4 ml.min-1 (probenecid co-administration). The metabolite formation clearances of both glucuronides were significantly decreased by probenecid, -45% and -54% for the phenolic and acyl glucuronide, respectively. The metabolite formation clearance of the sulphate conjugate was not affected by probenecid coadministration. Steady state plasma concentrations of the sulphate and glucuronide conjugates of diflunisal were 2.5- to 3.1-fold higher during probenecid co-administration, due to a significant reduction in the renal clearance of the three diflunisal conjugates. Probenecid also reduced the plasma protein binding of diflunisal, but only to a minor extent; the unbound plasma fraction of diflunisal at steady state averaged between 5 and 30% higher during probenecid co-administration.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDiflunisalDrug InteractionsGlucuronatesHumansMaleProbenecidProtein BindingSulfatesDiflunisalGlucuronatesProbenecidSulfates

Identifiers

PMID7768255
OpenAlexW2097413981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.