Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7764455›Full record

ReviewCytotechnology1993

The biology of radioresistance: similarities, differences and interactions with drug resistance.

S N Powell, E H Abraham

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cytotechnology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Corticosteroids compromise survival in glioblastoma.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The redox/DNA repair protein, Ref-1, is essential for early embryonic development in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S N PowellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
E H Abraham
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells and tissues have developed a variety of ways of responding to a hostile environment, be it from drugs (toxins) or radiation (summarized in Fig. 1). Three categories of radiation damage limitation are: (i) DNA repair (ii) changes in cellular metabolism (iii) changes in cell interaction (cell contact or tissue-based resistance; whole organism based resistance). DNA repair has been evaluated predominantly by the study of repair-deficient mutants. The function of the repair genes they lack is not fully understood, but some of their important interactions are now characterized. For example, the interaction of transcription factors with nucleotide excision repair is made clear by the genetic syndromes of xeroderma-pigmentosum groups B, D and G. These diseases demonstrate ultraviolet light sensitivity and general impairment of transcription: they are linked by impaired unwinding of the DNA required for both transcription and repair. The transfer of DNA into cells is sometimes accompanied by a change in sensitivity to radiation, and this is of special interest when this is the same genetic change seen in tumors. DNA repair has a close relationship with the cell cycle and cell cycle arrest in response to damage may determine sensitivity to that damage. DNA repair mechanisms in response to a variety of drugs and types of radiation can be difficult to study because of the inability to target the damage to defined sequences in vivo and the lack of a satisfactory substrate for in vitro studies. Changes in cellular metabolism as a result of ionizing radiation can impart radiation resistance, which is usually transient in vitro, but may be more significant in vivo for tissues or tumors. The mechanisms by which damage is sensed by cells is unknown. The detection of free radicals is thought likely, but distortion to DNA structure or strand breakage and a direct effect on membranes are other possibilities for which there is evidence. Changes in extracellular ATP occur in response to damage, and this could be a direct membrane effect. External purinergic receptors can then be involved in signal transduction pathways resulting in altered levels of thiol protection or triggering apoptosis. Changes in the functional level of proteins as a consequence of ionizing radiation include transcription factors, for example c-jun and c-fos; cell cycle arrest proteins such as GADD (growth arrest and DNA damage inducible proteins) and p53; growth factors such as FGF, PDGF; and other proteins leading to radioresistance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnimalsCell LineCell MembraneCell SurvivalDNA DamageDrug ResistanceHumansModels, BiologicalRadiation ToleranceX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID7764455
OpenAlexW2013834228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.