ArticleBiophysical journal1995
Photophysics of the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Fura-2.
Article in Biophysical journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex-dependent geroprotective effects of malvidin in Drosophila melanogaster.Biogerontology · 2025Article
- Elucidation of Medusozoan (Jellyfish) Venom Constituent Activities Using Constellation Pharmacology.Toxins · 2024Article
- Berberis vulgaris L. extract supplementation exerts regulatory effects on the lifespan and healthspan of Drosophila through its antioxidant activity depending on the sex.Biogerontology · 2024Article
- A Calcium Imaging Approach to Measure Functional Sensitivity of Neurons.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Calcium (Ca2+) waves data calibration and analysis using image processing techniques.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The photophysics of the complex forming reaction of Ca2+ and Fura-2 are investigated using steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements. The fluorescence decay traces were analyzed with global compartmental analysis yielding the following values for the rate constants at room temperature in aqueous solution with BAPTA as Ca2+ buffer: k01 = 1.2 x 10(9)s-1, k21 = 1.0 x 10(11) M-1 s-1, k02 = 5.5 x 10(8) s-1, k12 = 2.2 x 10(7) s-1, and with EGTA as Ca2+ buffer: k01 = 1.4 x 10(9) s-1, k21 = 5.0 x 10(10) M-1 s-1, k02 = 5.5 x 10(8) s-1, k12 = 3.2 x 10(7) s-1. k01 and k02 denote the respective deactivation rate constants of the Ca2+ free and bound forms of Fura-2 in the excited state. k21 represents the second-order rate constant of binding of Ca2+ and Fura-2 in the excited state, whereas k12 is the first-order rate constant of dissociation of the excited Ca2+:Fura-2 complex. The ionic strength of the solution was shown not to influence the recovered values of the rate constants. From the estimated values of k12 and k21, the dissociation constant K*d in the excited state was calculated. It was found that in EGTA Ca2+ buffer pK*d (3.2) is smaller than pKd (6.9) and that there is negligible interference of the excited-state reaction with the determination of Kd and [Ca2+] from fluorimetric titration curves. Hence, Fura-2 can be safely used as an Ca2+ indicator. From the obtained fluorescence decay parameters and the steady-state excitation spectra, the species-associated excitation spectra of the Ca2+ free and bound forms of Fura-2 were calculated at intermediate Ca2+ concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.