ArticleThe Biochemical journal1995
Effects of lactation on the signal transduction systems regulating lipolysis in sheep subcutaneous and omental adipose tissue.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of N-arachidonoylethanolamide administration on energy and fat metabolism of early lactating dairy cows.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Adipose tissue lipolysis and remodeling during the transition period of dairy cows.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2017Review
- Adaptations of maternal adipose tissue to lactation.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 1997Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of lactation on the regulation of lipolysis by beta- and alpha 2-adrenergic agents and by adenosine has been investigated. When changes in adipocyte mean cell volume (which decreases with lactation) are allowed for, lactation increased the maximum response both to beta-adrenergic agents and to the adenosine analogue N6-phenylisopropyladenosine, but had no apparent effect on the responsiveness of the alpha 2-adrenergic system in both subcutaneous and omental adipocytes. For subcutaneous adipocytes, there was no significant change in the number of beta-adrenergic or alpha 2-adrenergic receptors, but the amount of Gs and the maximum (forskolin-stimulated) adenylate cyclase activity were increased by lactation. In contrast, in omental adipocytes, the number of beta- (but not alpha 2-) adrenergic receptors and the amount of Gs were increased, whereas forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity was unchanged by lactation. In both types of adipocyte, cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase and total protein kinase A activities were unchanged. Lactation had no effect on the number of adenosine receptors but increased the amounts of the Gi isoforms expressed in both types of adipocyte. These various adaptations differ markedly in a number of respects from those described previously in the rat. Lactation, then, while having a similar overall effect on the response to beta-adrenergic agonists of adipocytes, achieves this by depot-specific mechanisms. In contrast, changes in response to adenosine appear to involve the same mechanism in the two depots investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.