Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7749563›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology1995

Efficient reidentification of chromosome slides from human metaphase spreads via microsatellite polymerase chain reaction.

C Epplen, J T Epplen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C EpplenMolekulare Humangenetik, MA, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany.
J T Epplen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to exclude inadvertent mixing of slides carrying metaphase spreads, chromosomal DNA was re-extracted several months after routine slide preparation (hypotonic treatment, spreading, fixation, staining, embedding and microscopic inspection) in different laboratories. The DNA yield was largely dependent on the number of cells originally fixed and the batch of the embedding material. Average fragment sizes ranged below 200 nucleotides. The polymerase chain reaction systems for DNA amplification included several polymorphic microsatellite loci specifically selected for short amplification products. Reidentification with a high probability for identity was possible by comparison with microsatellite alleles obtained from the peripheral blood of the individuals investigated. Possible applications, the differentiation potential and the limitations of the methodology are discussed.

Indexed as

AllelesBlood CellsChromosomes, HumanDNA, SatelliteGene FrequencyHistocytological Preparation TechniquesHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionQuality ControlSingle-Blind MethodSpecimen HandlingDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID7749563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.