Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7748961›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics1995

Simulation of electrocortical waves.

J J Wright, D T Liley

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cortical dynamics of neural-connectivity fields.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Wave Turbulence and Energy Cascade in the Hippocampus.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Stimulus statistics shape oscillations in nonlinear recurrent neural networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Outline of a general theory of behavior and brain coordination.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J J WrightMental Health Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
D T Liley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report simulations of the electrocorticogram of the cat and human, based on estimates of fibre range, fibre density, axonal and dendritic delays, and cortical synaptic density. The long-range cortical connections of real cortex were simplified to couplings of symmetric density, decreasing in density with range, on a closed (toroidal) surface. Non-specific cortical activation was modelled as a diffuse global input and specific sensory input as a localised white noise input. Spectral properties of output included peak densities at the frequencies of the major cerebral rhythms, a '1/f' spectral envelope and 'shift to the right' with increasing total power as non-specific activation increased. Steady-state travelling waves with a velocity of 5-7 m/s (human) and < 1 m/s (cat) were produced. Frequency/wavenumber analysis revealed an additional class of activity with wavenumbers independent of temporal frequency. All these findings accord qualitatively and quantitatively with existing physiological results. Global resonant modes were not prominent, but the simulations obey a restricted case of the analytical results of Nunez (1994). Wave/pulse relations resemble the findings of Freeman (1975).

Indexed as

Computer SimulationElectroencephalographyModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainCatsHumansNeural ConductionPyramidal Cells

Identifiers

PMID7748961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.