Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7747807›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology1995

c-myc copy number gains in bladder cancer detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

G Sauter, P Carroll, H Moch, A Kallioniemi, R Kerschmann, P Narayan, M J Mihatsch, F M Waldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Rab23 is overexpressed in human bladder cancer and promotes cancer cell proliferation and invasion.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic strategies to inhibit MYC.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G SauterDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
P Carroll
H Moch
A Kallioniemi
R Kerschmann
P Narayan
M J Mihatsch
F M Waldman
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

CYTOMETRIC AND OTHER MARKERS OF HUMAN BLADDER CANCERR01CA047537 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MAYALL, BRIAN H · 1989 to 1991
–
CYTOMETRIC AND OTHER MARKERS OF HUMAN BLADDER CANCERU01CA047537 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI WALDMAN, FREDERIC M. · 1992 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA47537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amplification and overexpression of c-myc have been suggested as prognostic markers in human cancer. To assess the role of c-myc gene copy number alterations in bladder cancer, 87 bladder tumors were examined for c-myc aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Dual labeling hybridization with a repetitive pericentromeric probe specific for chromosome 8 and a probe for the c-myc locus (at 8q24) was performed to analyze c-myc copy number in relation to chromosome 8 copy number on a cell by cell basis. A clear-cut c-myc amplification (up to 40 to 150 copies per cell) was found in 3 tumors. There was a low level c-myc copy number increase in 32 of the remaining 84 tumors. There was no association of low level c-myc copy number increase with c-myc protein overexpression. This suggests that a c-myc gene copy number gain as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization does not necessarily reflect a disturbed c-myc gene function but may indicate a structural chromosome 8 abnormality including gain of distal 8q. The strong association of low level c-myc (8q) gains with tumor grade (P < 0.0001), stage (P < 0.0001), chromosome polysomy (P < 0.0001), p53 protein expression (P = 0.0019), p53 deletion (P = 0.0403), and tumor cell proliferation (Ki67 labeling index; P = 0.0021) is consistent with a role of chromosome 8 alterations in bladder cancer progression.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Gene AmplificationGenes, mycHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKi-67 AntigenNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTumor Suppressor Protein p53Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsKi-67 AntigenNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID7747807
PMCPMC1869279
OpenAlexW1554018027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.