Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7747519›Full record

ReviewSozial- und Praventivmedizin1995

[Mumps vaccines: virological basis].

A Ströhle, D Germann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sozial- und Praventivmedizin, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A StröhleInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Bern.
D Germann
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevention of mumps virus infection relies on the application of live, attenuated mumps virus vaccines. The process of attenuation from a wildtype mumps isolate to a safe vaccine has been empirical. A lower degree of attenuation results in solid immunity but carries an increased risk of post-vaccination meningitis due to the vaccine strain. Currently used vaccine strains are highly attenuated and essentially free of vaccine strain induced disease. However, their immunogenicity may be lower than previously reported.

Indexed as

Mumps VaccineHumansMumps virusVaccines, InactivatedVirulenceMumps VaccineVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID7747519
OpenAlexW2402844502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.