Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7743656›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1995

Autoantigenic epitopes on eukaryotic L7.

A H von Mikecz, P H Hemmerich, H H Peter, U Krawinkel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A H von MikeczLehrstuhl für Immunologie, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Freiburg, Germany.
P H Hemmerich
H H Peter
U Krawinkel
University of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ribosomal protein L7 has been established recently as a novel autoantigen representing a frequent target for autoantibodies from patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Up to 75% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 50% of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) patients produce antibodies in vitro translated L7 and form immunoprecipitable complexes. In this study the B cell response to protein L7 was investigated with respect to the immunogenic determinants recognized by autoantibodies. Eighteen truncated fragments of protein L7 were generated as recombinant fusions with glutathione-S-transferase and examined by immunoblotting for their reactivity with sera from patients suffering from systemic rheumatic diseases. Anti-L7 antibodies target three major nonoverlapping autoepitopes. Two epitopes reside in the highly conserved C-terminal part of the protein, whereas the N-terminal autoepitope is not conserved during evolution. The N-terminal epitope comprises 24 amino acid residues. Ten amino acid resides of this epitope are shared with the BZIP-like RNA binding domain of protein L7. Autoantibodies recognizing this epitope crossreact with the corresponding region of a L7 homologue, namely ribosomal protein L7 (RPL7) from Dictyostelium discoideum. This indicates that amino acid residues 14VPE...KKR22, which are conserved between humans and fungi, contribute essentially to the formation of autoantibody-autoantigen complexes.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAutoantigensCross ReactionsDictyosteliumEpitope MappingHumansMolecular Sequence DataRecombinant ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Amino AcidAutoantigensRecombinant ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRPL7 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID7743656
PMCPMC1534329
OpenAlexW2095401727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.