Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7742682›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1995

Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving.

W Rosenberg, A Donald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Barriers to GPs' use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. [Diurnal frequency patterns of errors made in ophthalmo-surgery. A clinical analysis related to evidence based medicine].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2005
    Trial
  11. Same information, different decisions: the influence of evidence on the management of hypertension in the elderly.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1996
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. THE IDEAL HOUSE OFFICER: TRAINEE'S PERSPECTIVES.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Tinnitus Guidelines and Their Evidence Base.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

W RosenbergNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford.
A Donald

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doctors within the NHS are confronting major changes at work. While we endeavour to improve the quality of health care, junior doctors' hours have been reduced and the emphasis on continuing medical education has increased. We are confronted by a growing body of information, much of it invalid or irrelevant to clinical practice. This article discusses evidence based medicine, a process of turning clinical problems into questions and then systematically locating, appraising, and using contemporaneous research findings as the basis for clinical decisions. The computerisation of bibliographies and the development of software that permits the rapid location of relevant evidence have made it easier for busy clinicians to make best use of the published literature. Critical appraisal can be used to determine the validity and applicability of the evidence, which is then used to inform clinical decisions. Evidence based medicine can be taught to, and practised by, clinicians at all levels of seniority and can be used to close the gulf between good clinical research and clinical practice. In addition it can help to promote self directed learning and teamwork and produce faster and better doctors.

Indexed as

Clinical MedicineDecision Support TechniquesProblem SolvingDatabases, BibliographicData CollectionEducation, Medical, ContinuingHumansProfessional Practice

Identifiers

PMID7742682
PMCPMC2549505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.