Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7720412›Full record

ArticleChromosoma1994

Analysis of centromeric activity in Robertsonian translocations: implications for a functional acrocentric hierarchy.

B A Sullivan, D J Wolff, S Schwartz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Centromere inactivation on a neo-Y fusion chromosome in threespine stickleback fish.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Dicentric chromosomes: unique models to study centromere function and inactivation.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2012
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Engineered human dicentric chromosomes show centromere plasticity.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2005
    Article
  12. Influences of chromosome size, gene density and nuclear position on the frequency of constitutional translocations in the human population.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2002
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Chromosome stability is maintained by short intercentromeric distance in functionally dicentric human Robertsonian translocations.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1998
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Centromere Silencing Mechanisms.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B A SullivanDepartment of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH 44106.
D J Wolff
S Schwartz
Case Western Reserve University · USCenter for Human Genetics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 90% of human Robertsonian translocations occur between nonhomologous acrocentric chromosomes, producing dicentric elements which are stable in meiosis and mitosis, implying that one centromere is functionally inactivated or suppressed. To determine if this suppression is random, centromeric activity in 48 human dicentric Robertsonian translocations was assigned by assessment of the primary constrictions using dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Preferential activity/constriction of one centromere was observed in all except three different rearrangements. The activity is meiotically stable since intrafamilial consistency of a preferentially active centromere existed in members of six families. These results support evidence for nonrandom centromeric activity in humans and, more importantly, suggest a functional hierarchy in Robertsonian translocations with the chromosome 14 centromere most often active and the chromosome 15 centromere least often active.

Indexed as

Translocation, GeneticAmniocentesisCells, CulturedCentromereChildChorionic Villi SamplingChromosome AberrationsChromosome DisordersChromosomes, HumanChromosomes, Human, Pair 14Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15FemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphocytesMeiosis

Identifiers

PMID7720412
OpenAlexW2166661313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.