Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7713430›Full record

ArticleGenetics1995

An inverse PCR screen for the detection of P element insertions in cloned genomic intervals in Drosophila melanogaster.

B Dalby, A J Pereira, L S Goldstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Screening insertion libraries for mutations in many genes simultaneously using DNA microarrays.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biological characterization of Drosophila Rapgap1, a GTPase activating protein for Rap1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1997
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B DalbyHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0683, USA.
A J Pereira
L S Goldstein
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a screening approach that utilizes an inverse polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect P element insertions in or near previously cloned genes in Drosophila melanogaster. We used this approach in a large scale genetic screen in which P elements were mobilized from sites on the X chromosome to new autosomal locations. Mutagenized flies were combined in pools, and our screening approach was used to generate probes corresponding to the sequences flanking each site of insertion. These probes then were used for hybridization to cloned genomic intervals, allowing individuals carrying insertions in them to be detected. We used the same approach to perform repeated rounds of sib-selection to generate stable insertion lines. We screened 16,100 insert bearing individuals and recovered 11 insertions in five intervals containing genes encoding members of the kinesin superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster. In addition, we recovered an insertion in the region including the Larval Serum Protein-2 gene. Examination by Southern hybridization confirms that the lines we recovered represent genuine insertions in the corresponding genomic intervals. Our data indicates that this approach will be very efficient both for P element mutagenesis of new genomic regions and for detection and recovery of "local" P element transposition events. In addition, our data constitutes a survey of preferred P element insertion sites in the Drosophila genome and suggests that insertion sites that are mutable at a rate of approximately 10(-4) are distributed every 40-50 kb.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsBase SequenceCloning, MolecularCrosses, GeneticDNADrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic TestingInsect HormonesKinesinsMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesisDNADNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila ProteinsInsect HormonesKinesinslarval serum protein, DrosophilaMicrotubule-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID7713430
PMCPMC1206379
OpenAlexW1841052685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.