ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995
Vascular pharmacology of methylene blue in vitro and in vivo: a comparison with NG-nitro-L-arginine and diphenyleneiodonium.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- GKT137831 and hydrogen peroxide increase the release of 6-nitrodopamine from the human umbilical artery, rat-isolated right atrium, and rat-isolated vas deferens.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Adverse effects of methylene blue in peripheral neurons: AnMolecular pain · 2022Article
- Vasodilator effects of sodium nitroprusside, levcromakalim and their combination in isolated rat aorta.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The vascular effects of the soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor, methylene blue as well as the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG) and diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) were studied in rat isolated aortic rings and conscious, unrestrained rats. 2. Acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) caused concentration-dependent relaxation of preconstricted aortic rings. Both methylene blue (1 x 10(-5) M) and L-NOARG (3 x 10(-5) M) abolished ACh-induced relaxation; however, methylene blue but not L-NOARG shifted the concentration-response curve of SNP to the right. 3. In conscious rats, i.v. infusion of methylene blue (1.1 x 10(-5) mol kg-1 min-1), at a concentration which reduced the aortic tissue level of cyclic GMP by 50%, did not significantly alter mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). In contrast, i.v. bolus injection of L-NOARG (1.5 x 10(-4) mol kg-1) markedly increased MAP and decreased HR. 4. Both ACh and SNP dose-dependently decreased MAP in conscious rats. Methylene blue did not alter the magnitude or duration of ACh- or SNP-induced depressor responses. L-NOARG, on the other hand, significantly though incompletely, reduced the magnitude and duration of the depressor response to ACh but not SNP. The depressor response to ACh or SNP was not altered by pretreatment with indomethacin (1.4 x 10(-5) mol kg-1) or capsaicin (3.3 x 10(-4) mol kg-1). 5. NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) also caused dose-dependent increases in MAP in conscious rats. Both methylene blue and DPI (1 x 10-5 mol kg-1) selectively shifted the dose-pressor response curve of L-NAME to the right.6. These results suggest that: (1) the inhibition of endogenous NO biosynthesis does not necessarily lead to pressor response in vivo, (2) L-NOARG may not produce pressor response solely via the inhibition of endogenous endothelial NO biosynthesis, and (3) the depressor responses to ACh and SNP may not involve the release of NO or prostanoids or afferent nerve transmitters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.