ArticleLangenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie1995
[Long-term follow-up of Parks posterior repair. An electromyographic, manometric and radiologic study of 31 patients].
Article in Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence.Gastroenterology report · 2014Article
- Interest of retro-anal levator plate myorrhaphy in selected cases of descending perineum syndrome with positive anti-sagging test.BMC surgery · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was carried out to document the long-term results of postanal repair for idiopathic faecal incontinence. Thirty-one patients (mean age 65.6 years) were followed up for 2-7.5 years (median 4.2 years). Continence was improved in 16 (52%) patients, only 2 (6%) of whom regained normal continence. No significant change in resting and pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, pelvic descent or anorectal angle was seen postoperatively. The electromyographical signs, e.g. duration and amplitude of action potentials, average amplitude, and integrals of the curves did not change significantly after the operation. The mean right pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) increased from 2.38 ms before to 2.59 ms after surgery (P > 0.05). No significant change in the continence and defaecation index was seen postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7707847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.