ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1995
Longer local retention of adoptively transferred T-LAK cells correlates with lesser adhesion molecule expression than NK-LAK cells.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antigen direction of specific T-cell clones into gingival tissues.Immunology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The local retention of adoptively transferred lymphokine (IL-2)-activated killer (LAK) cells was examined in 11 patients with head and neck carcinoma. Unseparated lymphocytes, T and natural killer (NK) cells isolated from patients were cultured with IL-2 for 7 days, labelled with 99mTc-HMPAO, and immediately injected back into the respective donors via the superficial temporal artery or locally into the tumour tissue. The injected LAK cells were periodically traced using a gamma camera, and the LAK cell retention rate was calculated from the radioactivity. One hour after the injection, about 70% of the locally infiltrated LAK cells remained in the tumour tissue, while about half of the LAK cells transferred via the regional artery were dislodged from the tissue. LAK cells induced from T cells (T-LAK) were retained in the tissue for a longer time than LAK cells induced from NK cells (NK-LAK). T-LAK were less chemotactic and less adherent to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), and showed lesser migration through EC. Flow cytometric analysis revealed higher expression of CD11a, CD11b, CD18 and CD49d on NK-LAK compared with T-LAK. MoAbs against these adhesion molecules suppressed adhesion and migration of LAK cells. These results indicate that the rapid disappearance of NK-LAK from the tissue is associated with their greater chemotactic and adhesive as well as migratory activities depending on differing expression of adhesion molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.