Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7697578›Full record

ReviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne1995

Effectiveness of physician-based interventions with problem drinkers: a review.

M Kahan, L Wilson, L Becker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Brief intervention for alcohol use by pregnant women.American journal of public health · 2007
    Trial
  16. A cluster randomised trial to evaluate a nutrition training programme.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M KahanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ont.
L Wilson
L Becker
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the results of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of brief physician interventions with problem drinkers. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published from 1966 and 1972 respectively, with the terms "problem/controlled/responsible/moderate/risk/drink"; "advice/drink"; "physician, nurse, general practitioner"; and "random." Forty-three articles were identified in the EMBASE search and 112 articles in the MEDLINE search. STUDY SELECTION: All trials examining the effectiveness of interventions by physicians in reducing alcohol consumption among problem drinkers attending a health-care facility were reviewed. Trials involving subjects attending an alcohol treatment clinic and those involving interventions delivered solely by nonphysicians were excluded. Eleven trials met the final selection criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: For each article, two of the authors independently assigned a score from 0 to 2 on a number of criteria for validity and generalizability. DATA SYNTHESIS: The four trials with the highest validity scores showed that men in the intervention groups reduced their weekly alcohol consumption by five to seven standard drinks more than the men in the control groups. Results for women were inconsistent. No convincing evidence of declines in alcohol-related morbidity among men or women was found.

conclusionsThe trials support the use of brief interventions by physicians for patients with drinking problems. Although further studies are needed to determine their effect on morbidity and mortality, the public health impact of such interventions is potentially enormous. Further research is needed to determine which patients are best suited for brief interventions, the optimal intensity of treatment and which components of brief interventions are most effective. Research is also needed to establish which strategies are effective in inducing physicians to use brief interventions.

Indexed as

Physician's RoleAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID7697578
PMCPMC1337758
OpenAlexW1962576892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.