Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7697218›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology1995

Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour and extra-osseous Ewing's sarcoma; a histological, immunohistochemical and DNA flow cytometric study.

M Brinkhuis, L C Wijnaendts, J C van der Linden, A J van Unnik, P A Voûte, J P Baak, C J Meijer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Histology image analysis for carcinoma detection and grading.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2012
    Article
  9. Lumbar region intra-spinal primitive neuroectodermal tumour (PNET) combined with neurofibromatosis type 1.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2005
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M BrinkhuisDepartment of Pathology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L C Wijnaendts
J C van der Linden
A J van Unnik
P A Voûte
J P Baak
C J Meijer
University of Amsterdam · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour (pPNET) and extra-osseous Ewing's sarcoma (EES) are thought to be closely related neoplasms, their clinical behaviour differs considerably. To determine the clinical relevance of the Schmidt classification scheme for differentiating pPNET and EES, 20 tumour specimens of poorly differentiated round cell tumours were evaluated. In addition, the diagnostic value of several neural markers and the prognostic value of quantitative morphological variables (DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction, and the mitotic activity) were assessed. Homer-Wright rosettes were present in 9 tumours. Neuron specific enolase (NSE) was expressed in 11 tumours, 8 of which expressed a second neural marker (CD57, S100, or neurofilament). According to the Schmidt classification, 11 pPNET and 5 EES were distinguished. HBA-71 was exclusively expressed in pPNET and EES. The remaining tumours were classified as sarcoma not otherwise specified (n = 2), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1), and desmoplastic tumour with divergent differentiation (n = 1). EES611 patients fared significantly better than the pPNET patients (100% versus 42% 5-year survival). Neither DNA ploidy nor S-phase fraction assessed in 12 evaluative histograms (9 pPNET and 3 EES), nor mitotic activity yielded information of additional prognostic value. On the basis of this study and the Schmidt classification scheme, it can be concluded that if the diagnosis of EES and pPNET is based on light microscopy (Homer-Wright rosettes) and/or immunohistochemistry (at least two neural markers, i.e. NSE, S-100, CD57, and neurofilament), the classification provides important clinical information. Furthermore, positivity for HBA-71 is helpful in differentiating pPNET and EES from all other small round cell tumours.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDNA, NeoplasmFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesInfantMaleMitotic IndexNeuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive, PeripheralPrognosisSarcoma, EwingSoft Tissue NeoplasmsDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID7697218
OpenAlexW2086385064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.