Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7682139›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1993

A comparison of capsazepine and ruthenium red as capsaicin antagonists in the rat isolated urinary bladder and vas deferens.

C A Maggi, S Bevan, C S Walpole, H P Rang, S Giuliani

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms and the clinical relevance of complex drug-drug interactions.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2018
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Similarities and differences between the responses of rat sensory neurons to noxious heat and capsaicin.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1999
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C A MaggiPharmacology Department, A. Menarini Pharmaceuticals, Florence, Italy.
S Bevan
C S Walpole
H P Rang
S Giuliani
Menarini Group (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The ability of capsazepine, a recently developed capsaicin receptor antagonist, to prevent the effects of capsaicin on the rat isolated urinary bladder (contraction) and vas deferens (inhibition of electrically-evoked twitches) was compared to that of ruthenium red, a dye which behaves as a functional antagonist of capsaicin. 2. In the rat bladder, capsazepine (3-30 microM) produced a concentration-dependent rightward shift of the curve to capsaicin without any significant depression of the maximal response to the agonist. By contrast, ruthenium red (10-30 microM) produced a non-competitive type of antagonism, characterized by marked depression of the maximal response attainable. Similar findings were obtained in the rat isolated vas deferens in which capsazepine (10 microM) produced a rightward shift of the curve to capsaicin while ruthenium red (3 microM) depressed the maximal response to the agonist. 3. At the concentrations used to block the effect of capsaicin, neither capsazepine nor ruthenium red affected the contractile response of the rat urinary bladder produced by either neurokinin A or electrical field stimulation or the twitch inhibition produced by rat alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide (alpha CGRP) in the vas deferens. 4. These findings provide additional evidence that both capsazepine and ruthenium red are valuable tools for exploration of the function of capsaicin-sensitive primary afferent neurones. The antagonism of the action of capsaicin by capsazepine is entirely consistent with the proposed interaction of this substance with a vanilloid receptor located on primary afferents, while the action of ruthenium red apparently involves a more complex, non-competitive antagonism.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCapsaicinElectric StimulationIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SmoothNeurokinin ARatsRats, WistarRuthenium RedUrinary BladderVas DeferensCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCapsaicincapsazepineNeurokinin ARuthenium Red

Identifiers

PMID7682139
PMCPMC1908039
OpenAlexW2094326590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.