ArticleMolecular biology reports1993
Stable expression of antibiotic resistance genes using a promoter fragment of the U1 snRNA gene.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- RNA Polymerase II Activity of Type 3 Pol III Promoters.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As U1 snRNA is produced in all mammalian cell types, antibiotic resistance genes driven by this promoter would be ideally suited as genetic selection markers. However, although the U1 snRNA gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase II, its native product is not a messenger RNA, but a splicing cofactor. To test whether this promoter could nevertheless produce a functional mRNA, sensitive reporter genes expressing resistance to the antibiotics hygromycin-B and bleomycin were constructed with either the U1 snRNA promoter or the SV40 early promoter. Resistant cell lines could only be obtained with constructs equipped with a functional polyadenylation signal. With the U1 snRNA promoter about three times fewer colonies were obtained than with the SV40 early promoter. Another potential advantage of the U1 snRNA promoter is that, in contrast to the promoters commonly used to express genetic selection markers, the enhancer-like element contained in the U1 snRNA promoter had only a minimal stimulative effect, only detectable with the most sensitive methods, on an adjacent mRNA-producing gene. The U1 snRNA promoter was also capable of expressing bleomycin resistance in the context of a self-inactivating retrovirus vector, whereby it was discovered that the mouse 3T3 cells used in this experiment were 10 times more sensitive to bleomycin than human or hamster cell lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.