Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7669261›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1995

Absorption interactions with fluoroquinolones. 1995 update.

B M Lomaestro, G R Bailie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Zinc Toxicity: Understanding the Limits.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B M LomaestroAlbany Medical Center Hospital, Pharmacy Department, New York, USA.
G R Bailie
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of the fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics is rapidly expanding due to their favourable pharmacokinetic profile and the continuing development of new compounds. These agents are often used for indications not successfully treated with other orally available antimicrobials in the past, or for 'step-down' therapy in patients originally treated with intravenous agents. As the usage of these agents expands for serious systemic infections, knowledge of absorptive interactions with fluoroquinolones becomes paramount. Fluoroquinolones are often utilised in dosages and against modestly susceptible pathogens which allow a narrow margin for acceptable decreases in bioavailability. Chelation interactions with multivalent cations can result in inactivation of the fluoroquinolone with ramifications in vitro and in vivo. Chelation interactions have been reported to occur in between 22 and 76% of patients prescribed fluoroquinolones. Concurrent administration of magnesium-aluminum antacids and sucralfate has the greatest effect on the bioavailability of quinolones followed by iron, calcium and zinc. Spacing doses of fluoroquinolones and interactants has been suggested as a method of ensuring adequate quinolone absorption, but this can make optimal administration of the cation interactant difficult, if not impossible.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAnti-Infective AgentsChelating AgentsDrug InteractionsFluoroquinolonesFood-Drug InteractionsHumansAnti-Infective AgentsChelating AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID7669261
OpenAlexW1989777224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.