UPD 13: no indication of maternal or paternal imprinting of genes on chromosome 13.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Uniparental disomy in Robertsonian translocations: strategies for uniparental disomy testing.Translational pediatrics · 2014
   Review
2. Maternal origin of 47,XXY and confined placental mosaicism 47,XXY/48,XXY,+13 in an infant conceived through IVF.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2013
   Article
3. Two novel homozygous SACS mutations in unrelated patients including the first reported case of paternal UPD as an etiologic cause of ARSACS.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2011
   Article
4. Complex and segmental uniparental disomy (UPD): review and lessons from rare chromosomal complements.Journal of medical genetics · 2001
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 13 in a phenotypically normal child.1994

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as