Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7650194›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1995

Comparison of three typing methods for clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus.

D Lin, P F Lehmann, B H Hamory, A A Padhye, E Durry, R W Pinner, B A Lasker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiology and Prevention of Invasive Aspergillosis.Current infectious disease reports · 2001
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 1999
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D LinDepartment of Microbiology, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo 43699-0008, USA.
P F Lehmann
B H Hamory
A A Padhye
E Durry
R W Pinner
B A Lasker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate procedures used for epidemiologic analysis of outbreaks of aspergillosis, we analyzed a collection of 35 Aspergillus fumigatus isolates using three typing methods: isoenzyme analysis (IEA), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, and restriction endonuclease analysis (REA). Twenty-one isolates were from a single hospital, with four isolates coming from different patients. Three clinical isolates came from a different hospital, and 11 clinical or environmental isolates were derived from a culture collection. With IEA, the patterns of alkaline phosphatase, esterase, and catalase discriminated nine types. In contrast, 22 types were obtained with five different RAPD primers, and 21 types could be detected with three of these (R108, R151, and UBC90). Restriction endonuclease analysis of genomic DNA, digested with either XbaI, XhoI, or SalI, detected 3, 17, and 13 different REA types, respectively, and 22 types were identified by combining the data from the XhoI and SalI REAs. Twenty-eight types were obtainable with a combination of REA, IEA, and RAPD patterns. Overall, the results pointed to substantial genetic variation among the isolates. Though two isolates had markedly distinct genotypes, their morphologic features and exoantigens were consistent with their being A. fumigatus. The analysis will help in planning epidemiologic studies of aspergillosis.

Indexed as

AspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusBase SequenceDisease OutbreaksDNA, FungalDNA PrimersEnvironmental MicrobiologyEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansIsoenzymesMolecular EpidemiologyMolecular Sequence DataMycologyPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthProhibitinsDNA, FungalDNA PrimersIsoenzymesPHB2 protein, humanProhibitins

Identifiers

PMID7650194
PMCPMC228223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.