ArticleJournal of anatomy1994
Perichondrial and endochondral components of mandibular condylar growth: morphometric and autoradiographic quantitation in rats.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- RNA-seq analysis unveils differential gene expression patterns following intermittent hypoxia in the mandibular condyles of growing male rats.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Cellular proliferation in the nasal septal cartilage of juvenile minipigs.Journal of anatomy · 2014Article
- Morphological and histopathological changes in orofacial structures of experimentally developed acromegaly-like rats: an overview.International journal of endocrinology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an attempt to determine the contribution of the perichondrial and endochondral components to rapid and slow overall condylar growth, mandibular condyles from rats aged 21 and 45 d as well as 3 and 6 months were examined by light microscopy. A morphometric analysis served to estimate the size of cells and the amount of extracellular matrix per cell in the various tissue layers beneath the articular surface. Quantitative evaluation of autoradiographic labelling due to the presence of [3H]-thymidine, [3H]-proline, and [35S]-sulphate 1.5 or 2 h and 5 d after injection of the tracer was used to determine the velocity of overall condylar growth. A combination of the two types of results allowed the calculation of daily rates in (1) the generation of new chondrocytes, constituting the perichondrial growth component, and the endochondral components comprising (2) net accumulation of extracellular matrix in the cartilage and (3) enlargement of the chondrocytes. It was observed that the 3 factors contributed, respectively, by about 10-25, 30 and 45-60% to rapid growth and by about 75, 15 and 10% to slow growth. Thus when growth slowed, the contribution of chondrocyte enlargement declined markedly and that of matrix accumulation slightly, while the contribution of new cell generation increased correspondingly. Declines in chondrocyte enlargement and in accumulation of cartilage matrix that was related mainly to decreasing proteoglycan formation were in good agreement with age-associated variation in weight gain, while peak rates in generation of new chondrocytes appeared to be delayed against peak somatic growth. It is concluded that (1) endochondral components contribute most to particularly rapid condylar growth, exceeding the perichondrial component, and (2) endochondral components of condylar growth are regulated by systemic factors that also control somatic growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7649794PMC1166665W145186216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.