Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7648483›Full record

Trial reportCalcified tissue international1995

Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss by rectal calcitonin.

J Y Reginster, I Jupsin, R Deroisy, I Biquet, N Franchimont, P Franchimont

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Calcified tissue international, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Parathyroid hormone in the treatment of involutional osteoporosis: back to the future.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 1997
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J Y ReginsterCentre Universitaire d'Investigation du Métabolisme Osseux et du Cartilage Articulaire, Université de Liège, Belgium.
I Jupsin
R Deroisy
I Biquet
N Franchimont
P Franchimont
University of Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BEGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A group (150) of healthy women, who had been menopausal for less than 5 years and who had never received any form of treatment to prevent bone loss were entered into a randomized, controlled study comprising three arms. They were randomly allocated to the double-blind administration of five suppositories per week containing either 100 IU of salmon calcitonin or a placebo, or to a group receiving a suppository containing 200 IU of salmon calcitonin three times per week. All women received 500 mg/day of calcium supplementation. After 12 months, bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine, measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, decreased significantly (P < 0.01) in the placebo group by 3.1% (SD: 3.6%) but did not change in the two calcitonin groups [+1.3% (3.5%) with 100 IU/day and +2.3% (4.0%) with 200 IU 3/week]. The differences in response between the placebo group and the two calcitonin groups were significant (P < 0.05), but the difference between the two regimens of calcitonin administration was not. No differences appeared among the three groups for the response at the level of the hip. Evolution of biochemical markers reflecting bone turnover did not differ significantly among groups. Nearly 40% of the women withdrew prematurely because of local (rectal or intestinal) intolerance to repetitive suppositories, with a nonsignificantly different frequency in the placebo or calcitonin groups. We conclude that rectal calcitonin might be an interesting preventive approach against trabecular postmenopausal bone loss but that long-term acceptability of suppositories should be evaluated in view of each patient's sensibility or cultural background.

Indexed as

Administration, RectalBone DensityCalcitoninCalciumDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHipHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalSpineTime FactorsCalcitoninCalciumsalmon calcitonin

Identifiers

PMID7648483
OpenAlexW1984294197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.