ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment1995
ErbB-2 oncoprotein overexpression in breast carcinoma: inverse correlation with biochemically- and immunohistochemically-determined hormone receptors.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathobiological features of breast tumours in the State of Kuwait: a comprehensive analysis.Journal of carcinogenesis · 2007Article
- Identification and validation of an ERBB2 gene expression signature in breast cancers.Oncogene · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between erbB-2 oncoprotein overexpression and hormone receptors in breast cancer is controversial. Of 320 infiltrating carcinomas, 75 (23%) showed membranous positivity for erbB-2 protein using CB-11 antibody, with 31 (9.7%) strongly positive. Estrogen and progesterone receptors, determined by both biochemical and immunohistochemical assays, were negative more often in strongly erbB-2 positive tumors, or were positive at lower amounts, than in 56 tumors devoid of CB-11 staining. Strong erbB-2 positivity also correlated with lower patient age, higher histopathologic tumor grade, and higher S phase fraction, but not with tumor size, lymph node involvement, or DNA aneuploidy. Thirty-three lobular carcinomas showed strong erbB-2 positivity as frequently as the overall group (9.1%). Cytoplasmic CB-11 positivity without membrane positivity, thought not to correlate with true erbB-2 positivity, was observed in 189 (59%) tumors with a slight (1-2 +) reaction in 124 (39%) tumors and a moderate-to-strong (3-4 +) reaction in 65 (20%) tumors. Moderate-to-strong cytoplasmic positivity correlated with higher histopathologic grade and negativity for immunohistochemical, but not biochemical, hormone receptors. CB-11 cytoplasmic positivity may have biological significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.