ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN1995
An open study of tolerability and pharmacokinetics of raclopride extended release capsules in psychiatric patients: a Canadian study.
Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The dopamine agonism on ADP-stimulated platelets is mediated through D2-like but not D1-like dopamine receptors.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2008Article
- A review of the discovery, pharmacological characterization, and behavioral effects of the dopamine D2-like receptor antagonist eticlopride.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2008Review
- Biotransformation of post-clozapine antipsychotics: pharmacological implications.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tolerability and pharmacokinetics of raclopride extended release (ER) capsules have been evaluated after a single oral dose and at steady state, with 3 different daily doses in 4 male patients requiring neuroleptic treatment. In this 3-week open study, the drug was administered to patients in increasing bid doses of 8 mg, 12 mg and 16 mg, respectively, for each 1-week treatment period, following a 1-week placebo washout. With this limited number of patients, assessments of clinical chemistry, hematology, cardiovascular variables and adverse symptoms suggest that raclopride is safe and well-tolerated in the group studied. The administration of repeated doses of raclopride showed linear pharmacokinetics based on parameter values which are either constant (effective elimination half-life, total plasma clearance, and dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve) or varying proportionally (trough plasma concentration, peak plasma concentration, average plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for a dosage interval at steady state) with the doses. The linear 1-compartment open model with zero-order absorption was the most appropriate pharmacokinetic model describing the raclopride plasma concentration profile after a single 8 mg dose of raclopride ER capsules. The ER formulation reduced the fluctuation between peak and trough plasma drug concentrations which has been reported before with instant release dosage forms. In this study, the increase of plasma prolactin concentrations above the normal limit was transient and returned to normal levels. Although the plasma prolactin concentration tended to increase with the drug dose, no direct relationship between raclopride dose and prolactin plasma concentrations was found. The correlation of plasma prolactin response with the plasma raclopride concentration showed a low level of hysteresis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7647082PMC1188704W155182020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.